Posted in Pseudoscience, Research Blogging, Science on February 7, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
There is a further update on the discussion the other day about Casey Luskin using the research blogging icon inappropriately on the official research blogging news site here.
I talked privately with science ethicist Janet Stemwedel, and she agrees that the blurring of the distinction between what’s supported by the article itself and what constitutes the [...]
Posted in Pseudoscience, Research Blogging, Science on February 6, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
Recently, there has been some discussion over a post by the discovery institutes Casey Luskin over the use of the research blogging sites icon for “blogging on peer reviewed research”. This spawned some discussion over at the associated news blog for research blogging, particularly over if Casey followed the relevant rules and appropriately represented the [...]
